a large-scale military exercise of troops, warships, and other forces.

forces would be reduced in proportion to the smaller budget, retaining the same balance of capabilities. combat forces to deter military aggression against allies by denying or reversing military gains in regional conflicts. Option 1 retains the 2017 national security strategy of “deterrence by denial,” which relies heavily on U.S.Because forces can be reduced in many ways depending on the military strategy adopted, CBO created three broad options to illustrate the range of strategies that the United States could pursue under a budget that would be cut gradually by a total of $1 trillion, or 14 percent, between 20.

forces of a substantially smaller defense budget. The Congressional Budget Office was asked to examine the effects on U.S. Projected Funding for the Department of Defense Under 2021 FYDP and Illustrative $1 Trillion Reduction Effect on Units in 2031 of Various Options for a Reduced Defense Budget Effect on the Services of Various Options for a Reduced Defense Budget Hierarchy of Strategy Documents and Proposed 2022 Funding for Defense Programs Number of Personnel in the Active Component, 1948 to 2031 Funding for the Department of Defense, 1948 to 2031 Effect on Defensewide Operations of an Illustrative $1 Trillion Reduction in Funding Change in the Number of Units Under Various Options Funding and Military Personnel Under Various Options for a Reduced Defense Budget How Reductions Were Allocated to Service Branches.How CBO Generated a $1 Trillion Reduction.

Chapter 2: Options to Achieve Deterrence With a Smaller Defense Budget.Setting the Nation’s Priorities for Security.The Effect of Budget Reductions on the Number of Service Members.

How a $1 Trillion Reduction Would Compare With Past Budget Reductions.

What Are Some Limitations of CBO’s Analysis?.

A large-scale military exercise of troops, warships, and other forces.